Derrida deconstruction Review

ØIf I were a post- Structuralist critic …

                                        

             

                                         

ü           Hello Readers,

Ø     This blog is a part of my Classroom activity given on this blog.

Ø     What is deconstruction? What does Derrida say in deconstruction?

v                                    The Derrida questions it's possible to define what are the limits to what extent one can be find something. Derrida refuse To define deconstruction because we are habituated  for clear cut definition we want definition where it is not possible to define, deconstruction Deconstruction  can be defined as ideology break the foundation of Institution ideas deconstruction means something that is against construction destroyed .

v                                    Deconstruction is negative term because its talk about destroying idea, concept meaning in French. Deconstruction implied and enni halation negative reduction. much closer to Nietzchean demolition. Not exactly or negative term in fact it is not negative term actually The derrida is inquiring into the condition or what is philosophical system or meaning to stand up on its own and fall down he is inquiring into the foundation buried I wanted to transform the way people think.

v                                        Instance at the condition which you meaning to the system that very conditions put, so we can translate the construction its on.

v                                        Deconstruction in  the major influence on his thinking about the concept of1)S. Freud

2) M.Heideggar, 3) F. Nietche.    Date of himself in the form of letter to Japanese friends pointed out that the term was a product of his wish to turn it up to my one and the Heidggerian word destruction of a it signified contacts operation being the structure.

v                                       Heidegger book sein und zeit caries his hypothesis on being of being his book being of time . There is the talk on theme language refer to it is not man that speaks it is the language did speak man is decent read from language postmodernist post structuralist positions that language displacement is necessary to understand in order to get graphs over Deccan .

v                                        Saussure talk about connected the words the word with meaning it is not natural or the sign with its meaning signify is and her social construct .Derrida argue that meaning of the word in arbitrary relation and conversation all meaning of the word is nothing but another word one never arrives at meanings it is just moving from one word to another meaning of the word can be reached thought dictionary .

                                           It is true the Derrida the points out the western philosophy is built on the difference on the binary opposition just is language.

                                           Metaphysics of presence discuss in term of binary        opposition inherit in language and thus  in Philosophy binary opposition, white black,

      good and evil, man and woman. differentiate the meaning of one from the other in the letting   something for dark is the one platelet like something manliness it's reflecting the absence of something manliness things in inferior position in comparison to the one which have it the presence of hearly  opposition privilege one over the other day reader. Out with the position not equal but in Heritage where the second term in consider it arrives in fear the privilege.

v                                             If I were post structuralist  critic I would like to analyze  the following advertisement of is about cement  it's all melodrama.

          Thank You.....

                    

Structuralism and Literary Criticism.

Structuralism and Literary Criticism
Hello, Friends

•        
                          

                      Structuralism and Literary Criticism

                          This blog is part of my academic activity which is given on this blog.

                           In literary theory, structuralism is an approach in   Their is many structuralist  critic like Ferdinand Saussure, Gerard genette, roland barthes, claude levistrauss etc. stucturalist critic found basic structure in every work like TV serials and film industrial like even literature also, in narrative technique, in most of movie I often found hero similarity is general . like his structure is same structure.                                                            

                           We see in most of movie base on like this structure (1)  quest  [  In the quest not only something like go back and find beloved, but quest of knowledge also it is happen only literature novel, for example,

          

                                   

  Frankenstein, written by Marry Shelly there is hero is knowledgeable but his desire is more then tragedy happen, because he was create monster it’s how harmful.

                             

    Anther novel like   is like Doctor Faustus is very knowledgeable person but he want to more his desire not only knowledge but some like lust, pride, then traded happen . (2) Revenge or avenger (3) tragedy (4) happy ending ( happy ending is very little in the film ) .for example, tragedy movie in bollywood like 1) mother India,

                    There is movie Radha, a poor but righteous woman, struggles to raise her kids while going up against sukhilala, a greed money leader. Despite the many hurdles she faces, she refuses to sacrifice her integrity.

Director: Mehboob Khan.

 

                This are the type of the structure of the movie. anther example like, Happy ending movie

 1) zindagi na milegi dobara  

2) vivaah

 3) hum shath shaath hai .

                     These are the movie in happy ending hence as we all know that find common patten in every piece of literature. 

 

 

Thank you……!!!

                

 

 

                       

 

 

I.A.Richard figrative language.

Analysis of a Gujarati Gazal .

Hello friends, 

                                                                     

     

        I have made an effort to Analyse a Gazal, I hope you all will enjoy reading this blog.

Gazal Name: Shant zarukhe vaat Nirkhati.

Singer: Manhar Udhas

Ø     As per I.A.Richards Figurative language, the Gazal is analyzed

Ø     Shant zarukhe vat nirakhti

Shant zarukhe vat nirakhti
roop ni rani joi hati,
me ek sahejadi joi hati.

Tena hath ni mahendi hasti ti,
teni ankh nu kajal hastu tu,
ek nanu sarkhu upvan jane,
mosam joi nirakhtu tu.

Teni smit ma so so git hata,
teni chupki thi sangit hatu,
tene padchaya ni lagan hati,
tene pagrav sathe prit hati.

Tene yad na asopalav thi,
ek swapn mahel shangaryoto,
jara najar ne nichi rakhi ne
tene samay ne roki rakhyoto.

Te moja jem uchaltiti,
ne pavan ni jem laheratiti,
koi hasi ne same ave to,
bahu pyar bharyu sharmati ti.

Tene youvan ni ashish hati,
tene sarv balao dur hati,
tena prem ma bhagidar thava,
khud kudrat pan aatur hati.

Varso bad farithi aje aj jarukho joyo che.....
Jya git nathi, sangit nathi,
jya pagrav sathe prit nathi,
jya sapnao na mahel nathi ne,
urmio na khel nathi.

Bahu sunu sunu lage che
bahu vasmu vasmu lage che.

A nahoti mari premika ke
nahoti mari dulhan,
meto ane matr jarookhe
vat nirkhti joi hati,
kon hati a naam hatu shu,
a pan hu kya janu chu......

Tem chata a dil ne aaje
vasmu vasmu lage che,
bahu sunu sunu lage che.

Ø     Analysis:

Shant zarukhe vat nirakhti
roop ni rani joi hati,
me ek sahejadi joi hati.

Tena hath ni mahendi hasti ti,
teni ankh nu kajal hastu tu,
ek nanu sarkhu upvan jane,
mosam joi nirakhtu tu.

Teni smit ma so so git hata,
teni chupki thi sangit hatu,
tene padchaya ni lagan hati,
tene pagrav sathe prit hati.

                         In this above lines we find any girls waiting of someone she was stay with peacefully place like window there is out side gardening here line  of the Gazal like ,

                   

                   Tena hath ni mahendi hasti ti,
teni ankh nu kajal hastu tu,    

                       We find here poet was the Praise of girls she was very beautifully look wise there was natural thing with imagination of her “ Beauty “ . There is Reason behind happning all this thing Because she is love some one here we find often message poet say “  tene pagrav sathe prit hati. “

Tene yad na asopalav thi,
ek swapn mahel shangaryoto,
jara najar ne nichi rakhi ne
tene samay ne roki rakhyoto.

Te moja jem uchaltiti,
ne pavan ni jem laheratiti,
koi hasi ne same ave to,
bahu pyar bharyu sharmati ti.

                     Again we find poet is exaggerate Because she is love someone  then she is recall all those unconscious memory  poet explain with word like “Tene yad na asopalav thi, ek swapn mahel shangaryoto “ . poet compare with nature element like , “Te moja jem uchaltiti, ne pavan ni jem laheratiti “ she was very youth then her beauty is very attractive at that time  somebody is come with smile then she fill lovey smile with shamefull.

Tene youvan ni ashish hati,
tene sarv balao dur hati,
tena prem ma bhagidar thava,
khud kudrat pan aatur hati.

                      Again love of imagination of poet when she is youth their are so many thing is attractive somebody like his body to his beautyness there are give natural atmosphere of girl.

Varso bad farithi aje aj jarukho joyo che.....
Jya git nathi, sangit nathi,
jya pagrav sathe prit nathi,
jya sapnao na mahel nathi ne,
urmio na khel nathi.

Bahu sunu sunu lage che
bahu vasmu vasmu lage che.

                     In this above line we find after long time poet imagination he was return same place there are no space of lovely thing like time is left there is no love atmosphere because their are no girls it like she is left either may be she is become like old then he /she meet their are no romantic atmosphere then she was fill painful all those thing like loneliness and very painful he was portrait. His desire, felling it is not there because her youth age is gone or left it is atmosphere is painful poet.  

                
                                  
A nahoti mari premika ke
nahoti mari dulhan,
meto ane matr jarookhe
vat nirkhti joi hati,
kon hati a naam hatu shu,
a pan hu kya janu chu......

Tem chata a dil ne aaje
vasmu vasmu lage che,
bahu sunu sunu lage che.

                      In this line poet say when poet see at that time girl she is waiting of somebody then she’s look it’s very large attractive then poet like very heartily large part he was can’t forgive she is not lover of poet or wife but her look and romantic feeling is very attractive poet is like all those thing who she is ? what is name her? Not knowing but is painful then he suffer a lot “Tem chata a dil ne aaje vasmu vasmu lage che, vasmu vasmu lage che, “

Ø     Problem with understanding of gujrati lyric Gazal.

1)  ‘ mehendi’ and kajal cannot laugh.

2)  It’s imagination not possible in real like she is laughing with hundred song.

3)  We can’t stop of reality in time  or real life or time is not wait somebody.

4)It’s not possible ‘spout with sea’ and wind all those thing not happenings in reality.

Ø According to I.A.Richards language can be study of two ways: (1) Scientific use (2) emotive use.

                Here in Guajarati gazal in emotive use because here person feeling , desire , his elusion is very large. Then person is suffer a lot fell in love. The felling of love takes people in an illusionary word.

Ø   Propose of poet writing of gazal may be :  

            In the gazal we find poet write because he was fill in life then full of imagination here portrait. Poet has life some way or other any girls should pass his life then write.

Thank you……….!

Self Introduction

            

 Self Introduction

Hello everyone,

                         I am  Binkalba Gohil . I am 21 years old. I am pursuing my M.A in English, from Department of English( MKBU). This my personal blog in which will share my views. I live in Bhavnagar, Gujarat. Reading is my hobby, namesake is my favorite novel.  And also I like poem.