Monday 20 March 2017

Derrida deconstruction Review

ØIf I were a post- Structuralist critic …

                                        

             

                                         


ü           Hello Readers,


Ø     This blog is a part of my Classroom activity given on this blog.


Ø     What is deconstruction? What does Derrida say in deconstruction?



v                                    The Derrida questions it's possible to define what are the limits to what extent one can be find something. Derrida refuse To define deconstruction because we are habituated  for clear cut definition we want definition where it is not possible to define, deconstruction Deconstruction  can be defined as ideology break the foundation of Institution ideas deconstruction means something that is against construction destroyed .


v                                    Deconstruction is negative term because its talk about destroying idea, concept meaning in French. Deconstruction implied and enni halation negative reduction. much closer to Nietzchean demolition. Not exactly or negative term in fact it is not negative term actually The derrida is inquiring into the condition or what is philosophical system or meaning to stand up on its own and fall down he is inquiring into the foundation buried I wanted to transform the way people think.



v                                        Instance at the condition which you meaning to the system that very conditions put, so we can translate the construction its on.


v                                        Deconstruction in  the major influence on his thinking about the concept of1)S. Freud

2) M.Heideggar, 3) F. Nietche.    Date of himself in the form of letter to Japanese friends pointed out that the term was a product of his wish to turn it up to my one and the Heidggerian word destruction of a it signified contacts operation being the structure.


v                                       Heidegger book sein und zeit caries his hypothesis on being of being his book being of time . There is the talk on theme language refer to it is not man that speaks it is the language did speak man is decent read from language postmodernist post structuralist positions that language displacement is necessary to understand in order to get graphs over Deccan .


v                                        Saussure talk about connected the words the word with meaning it is not natural or the sign with its meaning signify is and her social construct .Derrida argue that meaning of the word in arbitrary relation and conversation all meaning of the word is nothing but another word one never arrives at meanings it is just moving from one word to another meaning of the word can be reached thought dictionary .


                                           It is true the Derrida the points out the western philosophy is built on the difference on the binary opposition just is language.





                                           Metaphysics of presence discuss in term of binary        opposition inherit in language and thus  in Philosophy binary opposition, white black,
      good and evil, man and woman. differentiate the meaning of one from the other in the letting   something for dark is the one platelet like something manliness it's reflecting the absence of something manliness things in inferior position in comparison to the one which have it the presence of hearly  opposition privilege one over the other day reader. Out with the position not equal but in Heritage where the second term in consider it arrives in fear the privilege.


v                                             If I were post structuralist  critic I would like to analyze  the following advertisement of is about cement  it's all melodrama.

          Thank You.....
                    



No comments:

Post a Comment