Saturday 16 September 2017

"The Birthday Party"

1

                                                                    


  Why are two scenes of Lulu omitted from the movie?

                                                                           

                             According  to me, In the film version of the birthday party he omitted scene between Lulu and  act .  The audience would focus on the character of a woman, who was abused by men.  and she would have been judged as victim, rather than the protagonist . In this film  is not unnecessary scene.
                           There is no way of knocking what printers actually motivation was in clipping lulus role . One possible explanation is that he probably felt that lulus reappearance in act three was only distracting the attention of the audience from Stainless impending Doom point however there might have been ways to integrate Lulu more organically into the play .

2 )  Is movie successful in giving us the effect of menace? Where you able to feel it while reading the text?
            
                   Yes,  In both the play and the film seems to be a trivia. The opening conversation between Mag and petey .

3)     Do you feel the effect of lurking danger while viewing the movie? Where you able to feel the same while reading the text.

                   In the film, we find  several times the knocking the door is lurking danger, And entire sequence is frightening. who is coming inside and somebody coming in inside and shouting. who is this? who is coming?  the person showing a such a way do not identify  revel little   a bit of frightening.

4)  What do you read in 'newspaper' in the movie? Petey is reading newspaper to Meg, it torn into pieces by McCain, pieces are hidden by Petey in last scene.

                     Newspaper, is a symbol of Reality or  hide of mask or reading is power. Inside the somebody is coming afraid of people most of the place, or writer tries to do that in the movie releasing the play.  begins there is a somebody's knocking the door, and Mac ask him who is there? who is there? but nobody reply.

5)      Camera is positioned over the head of McCain when he is playing Blind Man's Buff and is positioned at the top with a view of room like a cage (trap) when Stanley is playing it. What interpretations can you give to these positioning of camera? 

                      In the camera movement is first long short, of full room. And everybody was trapped inside the room. And then camera close-up upon the man’s Buff, then goes on.

6)  "Pinter restored theater to its basic elements: an enclosed space and unpredictable dialogue, where people are at the mercy of one another and pretense crumbles." (Pinter, Art, Truth & Politics: Excerpts from the 2005 Nobel Lecture). Does this happen in the movie?
                                                                    

                      Yes, with some exceptions it happens in the movie. Everybody shows care and love for each other, for example Lulu, Meg and Petey shows care towards Stanley but at the end when Stanley is in problem no one helps or even cares.

7)   How does viewing movie help in better understanding of the play ‘The Birthday Party’ with its typical characteristics (like painteresque, pause, silence, menace, lurking danger)?

                    Movie helps us in better understanding because, it gives more effect to menace. in the film, Pinter’s exact shift is from where to where? Pinter’s shift from an emphasis on people in the play to an emphasis on things in the film is  at the least a painteresque of the play.

8)   With which of the following observations you agree:

o   “It probably wasn't possible to make a satisfactory film of "The Birthday Party."
o    “It's impossible to imagine a better film of Pinter's play than this sensitive, disturbing version directed by William Friedkin”[3]. (Ebert)

                    I agree with the following observation:-
““It's impossible to imagine a better film of Pinter's play than this sensitive, disturbing version directed by William Friedkin”.
.

9)   If you were director or screenplay writer, what sort of difference would you make in the making of movie? Who would be your choice of actors to play the role of characters?
         
                              The movie is quite disturbing and excellent in a way. I don’t think I would like to make such film.

Thank You……..


No comments:

Post a Comment