Derrida deconstruction Review

ØIf I were a post- Structuralist critic …

                                        

             

                                         

ü           Hello Readers,

Ø     This blog is a part of my Classroom activity given on this blog.

Ø     What is deconstruction? What does Derrida say in deconstruction?

v                                    The Derrida questions it's possible to define what are the limits to what extent one can be find something. Derrida refuse To define deconstruction because we are habituated  for clear cut definition we want definition where it is not possible to define, deconstruction Deconstruction  can be defined as ideology break the foundation of Institution ideas deconstruction means something that is against construction destroyed .

v                                    Deconstruction is negative term because its talk about destroying idea, concept meaning in French. Deconstruction implied and enni halation negative reduction. much closer to Nietzchean demolition. Not exactly or negative term in fact it is not negative term actually The derrida is inquiring into the condition or what is philosophical system or meaning to stand up on its own and fall down he is inquiring into the foundation buried I wanted to transform the way people think.

v                                        Instance at the condition which you meaning to the system that very conditions put, so we can translate the construction its on.

v                                        Deconstruction in  the major influence on his thinking about the concept of1)S. Freud

2) M.Heideggar, 3) F. Nietche.    Date of himself in the form of letter to Japanese friends pointed out that the term was a product of his wish to turn it up to my one and the Heidggerian word destruction of a it signified contacts operation being the structure.

v                                       Heidegger book sein und zeit caries his hypothesis on being of being his book being of time . There is the talk on theme language refer to it is not man that speaks it is the language did speak man is decent read from language postmodernist post structuralist positions that language displacement is necessary to understand in order to get graphs over Deccan .

v                                        Saussure talk about connected the words the word with meaning it is not natural or the sign with its meaning signify is and her social construct .Derrida argue that meaning of the word in arbitrary relation and conversation all meaning of the word is nothing but another word one never arrives at meanings it is just moving from one word to another meaning of the word can be reached thought dictionary .

                                           It is true the Derrida the points out the western philosophy is built on the difference on the binary opposition just is language.

                                           Metaphysics of presence discuss in term of binary        opposition inherit in language and thus  in Philosophy binary opposition, white black,

      good and evil, man and woman. differentiate the meaning of one from the other in the letting   something for dark is the one platelet like something manliness it's reflecting the absence of something manliness things in inferior position in comparison to the one which have it the presence of hearly  opposition privilege one over the other day reader. Out with the position not equal but in Heritage where the second term in consider it arrives in fear the privilege.

v                                             If I were post structuralist  critic I would like to analyze  the following advertisement of is about cement  it's all melodrama.

          Thank You.....

                    

Structuralism and Literary Criticism.

Structuralism and Literary Criticism
Hello, Friends

•        
                          

                      Structuralism and Literary Criticism

                          This blog is part of my academic activity which is given on this blog.

                           In literary theory, structuralism is an approach in   Their is many structuralist  critic like Ferdinand Saussure, Gerard genette, roland barthes, claude levistrauss etc. stucturalist critic found basic structure in every work like TV serials and film industrial like even literature also, in narrative technique, in most of movie I often found hero similarity is general . like his structure is same structure.                                                            

                           We see in most of movie base on like this structure (1)  quest  [  In the quest not only something like go back and find beloved, but quest of knowledge also it is happen only literature novel, for example,

          

                                   

  Frankenstein, written by Marry Shelly there is hero is knowledgeable but his desire is more then tragedy happen, because he was create monster it’s how harmful.

                             

    Anther novel like   is like Doctor Faustus is very knowledgeable person but he want to more his desire not only knowledge but some like lust, pride, then traded happen . (2) Revenge or avenger (3) tragedy (4) happy ending ( happy ending is very little in the film ) .for example, tragedy movie in bollywood like 1) mother India,

                    There is movie Radha, a poor but righteous woman, struggles to raise her kids while going up against sukhilala, a greed money leader. Despite the many hurdles she faces, she refuses to sacrifice her integrity.

Director: Mehboob Khan.

 

                This are the type of the structure of the movie. anther example like, Happy ending movie

 1) zindagi na milegi dobara  

2) vivaah

 3) hum shath shaath hai .

                     These are the movie in happy ending hence as we all know that find common patten in every piece of literature. 

 

 

Thank you……!!!